Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Vintage Bicycle Rebuild "Styles"

After rebuilding a couple of old bikes, I think each person develops a certain "style" to how they rebuild bikes. Some people prefer to modify bikes, some restore with correct or period parts, and some do only light preservation. Some people mix all three methods. Some people have a style that changes over time, based on the circumstances of each bike. 


If I had to describe my preferred style today, it would be a mixture of "practical", "correct" and "time period". The idea is to maintain the history of the bike while also making is useful in the way it was originally intended to be used. My bikes are usually comfortable, practical machines as was originally intended by the manufacturer when they were made many years ago. 



"Use original parts when possible, but if need be, replace them. The best replacement is a direct original. Second choice would be a period correct part. Third choice would be a new part that is similar to the original. Last resort is a new part that is quite different from the original."

I preserve original parts wherever possible and consistent with the safety and use of the bike. Even if an original part is worn, it should be used when doing so is still consistent with safety and function. Is there a compelling reason to remove an original part? If not, try to keep using it. Sometimes there is a safety or function reason to swap a part, but try to use originals when you can.

A direct, correct part is the best replacement when you have to replace an original. Sometimes this is possible and sometimes not. Go with a correct/direct replacement if you can.

If you can't get a correct/direct replacement, try a "period correct" part, a replacement part from the same time period. 

If a period correct part is also not available, try a newer part that matches the technology and style of the bike. For example, a new Brooks B66 saddle on a three speed bike is perfectly acceptable if the original B66 is dried or broken. Parts made of leather or rubber often degrade over time. Or for example, use a new slotted screw to replace an old slotted screw that has stripped or broken. Using a hex headed screw on a 1940 Schwinn or Raleigh would look out of place, but a new slotted screw is closer. 

 

 

"A vintage bicycle should be reasonably safe and useful. It was intended to be ridden and your project should function consistent with that intent. Don't be afraid to replace consumable parts that affect safety and ride."

I replace consumable parts that have an effect on ride and safety. I replace rubber brake blocks/pads, worn brake cables, worn/damaged cable housings, worn shifter cables, worn tires/tubes, damaged handlebar grips, etc. It's not useful to have original brake blocks that squeal and won't stop the bike, or cables that are original but snap when you need to stop quickly, or tires that frequently flat because the sidewalls blow. I suppose this would not apply to "display only" bikes in museums and the like. But for my purposes, the bike needs to work and be reasonably safe. New parts should be similar in appearance and function to the old ones, where possible.

 



"Remove grime, dirt, and rust wherever possible. Do not remove good, old paint - even if it is faded. Gently clean the old paint and decals."

 I remove rust and clean off dirt/grime. Rust is simply a chemical reaction that corrodes ferrous metals such as iron and steel. The science is fairly straightforward. Rust should not be called "patina", which is often what a salesman will try to call it ["patina" originally referred to the green-ish oxidation of copper or bronze metals, something different]. I remove rust to the extent I can do so because it is a degradation of metal and should be cleaned up. I match and patch-up paint to prevent rust from returning. I treat bare metal or damaged chrome with WD-40 and similar products to help stave off rust. 

I clean up and lightly polish old paint. Faded paint helps give the old bike its character. I gently clean and polish it, but I do not remove it or try to make it look brand new. I gently clean up old decals and leave them in place whenever possible.


"Check all mechanical parts for damage or wear. Replace broken parts, bad bearings, bad races etc. Everything should work smoothly and as-intended by the manufacturer."

The bike should work properly. Wheels should turn smoothly and run true. Steering should be smooth, reliable, and precise. Brakes should feel crisp and grab reliably (within the limitations of their engineering). A bike that looks nice may not function well if you don't clean and check all the mechanical items. 




"Add accessories that make the bike safe. Observe safety laws. Try to use accessories that capture the look of the bike but which also add an element of safety."

If you need add-on LED lights or a bag with a reflector on it to be safe interacting with traffic, do it. I like retro lights that look correct from the outside, but which contain modern LEDs inside to aid visibility. I also like LED conversions for period lights, such as LED lights for Dynohub lamps.

 



 


 

 

 


2 comments:

  1. Hi Mike: Mark in Salt Lake again. Though I lack your breadth and depth expertise, I share your passion for the English 3-speeds. I think I evolved into the style you nicely summarize above. The first for me was a '58 ladies acquired for my wife--I put a lot into it and we still have it, Restoration-wise I have a question (preceded by some back story) for you: I own the 1938 Kimberley Freeman lightweight/Reynolds SR tubing you can google on bikeforums if curious. I may be the only owner of one of these obscure bikes. I obtained the original owner's name via an original of the letter Mr. Freeman sent to him, which came with the bike.. Sadly, no original catalogues of his appear to exist--but a librarian at Gateshead [UK] supplied me with other info about Mr. Freeman. I have the frame, forks, Williams crankset and the 3 sp. cyclo derailler. I plan to use a 36h K2 hub and quadrant shifter I've acquired, 1930s/40s celluloid north roads, a 1940's 36h #9 Bayliss front hub, .1948 GB brakes, GB flat levers. I love gb/s I have those on my 51 Raleigh Clubman. I went with incorrect 36h because 2 UK purchases of period Dunlop lightweight rims were both seized by customs for some reason and i own 2 lovely Araya 597 alloy 26 x 1 1/4 rims that look similar.
    Anyway, back to my question, on the Cabe there's some talk about using boiled linseed oil on the paint (Your article persuaded me not to clear coat). The Freeman's not a rust-bucket but there's paint loss... Would you personally try this on a frame? To brighten/preserve.....
    As before, many thanks for all the great info you give to the world and certainly delete this or don't publish if it's too wordy. My other bikes are a 1938 ladies BSA Keep-Fit loop frame (project), 51 Clubman, 53 ladies Norman, 68 gold Raleigh Sports, 65 Rudge Sports, 70 DL-1. I also look at Bikeforums, Cabe, Gentleman cyclist, Peter Kohler (and sadly Oldroads went away) I've never seen a gent's 23" utility Norman offered for sale (would love to own one). Regards,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Boiled linseed oil is a commonly used substance for rust prevention. It goes on and then, if the put on properly, dries hard. In some cases it can tint the paint color a little bit as it dries. It needs to be layered on thinly. If it's put on too thick, it may go gummy and not dry properly. It's a better option than clear coating because it's more easily reversible and provides a little better rust protection. Trying to remove the oil may cause paint loss if you're dealing with a two-stage paint as are often found on the 1940s-50s Raleighs. I don't personally use boiled linseed oil because it can be quite easy to mess up the application and end up with a gummy finish that then has to be removed. But it's a better option than clear coat and can work well if you're careful when you put it on the bike. I would not put it on surfaces subject to friction like brake tracks on rims. The oil can be removed with mineral spirits, paint thinner, or denatured alcohol, depending on the formulation. Removal may damage paint and decals. If you're going to try it, I'd test it on an inconspicuous area first. One other thing to keep in mind - boiled linseed oil is usually used on bare metal areas or areas where the paint is gone because it can have a tinting/coloring effect on certain paints. It's not 100% clear - it has a little tint to it.

      Delete

Please keep comments on topic and civil. Comments subject to moderation.